Scientova connects journal launch, manuscript submission, peer review, APC governance, production, publication, and auditability in one trusted scholarly publishing environment.
Scientova requests APC only after editorial acceptance, and every critical workflow action remains auditable.
This public site exposes journals and published articles only. Confidential editorial, reviewer, and finance activity remains permission-scoped.
Platform structure
Journal setup, manuscript intake, peer review, payment clearance, production, and publication all stay connected to a single controlled record.
Journal configuration and editorial scope
Launch and govern journals without breaking workflow boundaries.
Review, payment, and production handoff
Every stage remains auditable, version-aware, and permission scoped.
Featured journals
Each journal keeps its own review model, APC policy, editorial board, and submission posture while operating on shared architecture.
Continuous publication
The International Journal of AI and Multidisciplinary Research (IJAIMR) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research on artificial int...
No APC required
0 published articles
Latest articles
The public archive separates reader discovery from confidential editorial work, keeping the experience clear for both audiences.
Publishing workflow
The workflow engine, permissions, and audit model are designed to make editorial operations safer without making the interface heavier.
Trust section
Policies that help readers, authors, and editors understand the rules clearly.
Trust in academic publishing comes from explicit governance, fair review practice, APC clarity, and auditable change control.
For authors
Submit into a system that makes each stage legible.
Authors can track status, revision expectations, invoices, publication readiness, and final archive links without guessing where the manuscript is stuck.
For reviewers
Reviewer work deserves clearer boundaries and calmer tooling.
Invitations, deadlines, confidential editor notes, and author-visible comments are kept distinct so reviewers can focus on quality feedback instead of workflow guesswork.